Seth Rosenblatt

Seth Rosenblatt

At that place's the one-time joke about a man crawling on his hands and knees late at nighttime under a lamp mail service, looking for keys he lost two blocks abroad, because, as he tells a constabulary officer, "the light is ameliorate here."

I was reminded of this story recently listening to a panel nigh what was incorrect with the U.S. education organisation. Of course there are many problems, including the poor way we recruit, hire, evaluate, and pay teachers and our slow adoption of a truthful 21st Century Learning environment. Merely rarely does anyone mention poverty and income inequality in the U.Southward. We tin spend all the fourth dimension we want discussing "reforms," simply unless policy makers boldly confront poverty issues, many of our proposed changes – including ones for which I take advocated – will make a marginal effect on the whole system. Nosotros have become the man in the street looking in the wrong place because it'south the easier thing to practise.

Unfortunately the nature of mod-mean solar day politics is to eschew dash and complexity in favor of audio bites. Nosotros spend a lot of free energy discussing simplistic solutions such every bit punishing schools for bad test scores, blindly applying "market solutions," implementing parent triggers, closing schools, or simply bashing employees equally incompetent or the system as wasteful. But we all must know that improving the U.S. education system is far from uncomplicated.

Nosotros then ignore important data which may pb us to look in the right place. The truth is U.S. students really perform quite well against other countries in the world when you concur constant for income and wealth. Other studies ostend that student success is most highly correlated with parents' education and wealth, all the same nosotros then go along to ignore those factors in proposing solutions. Nosotros push the levers with the least leverage and somehow await them to make a dramatic difference.

This is non meant to be an excuse for poor-performing schools or an apology for low-income families. Yeah, poor students can learn and become incredibly successful and productive citizens. Only it's naive to believe that these socioeconomic disadvantages can just be overcome by great teachers and great schools. You need those, only for public education to be the truthful "great equalizer" it is proposed to be, nosotros need to dramatically look at the mission of, and investment in, our public school system.

In my upper-eye income community, we take for granted that most of our students become to preschool, can exist driven every mean solar day to school, have at least one parent who can volunteer in the schoolhouse and be there when kids get dwelling to assist with their homework. Many kids have tutors, go to multiple camps, travel extensively, and have many other extracurricular activities, all of which enhance their education. Virtually all of our parents have computers and Net access at home. The schoolhouse organisation is clearly not alone in educating these kids.

Just a few miles away lies a community without many of these benefits. Yet nosotros expect their schools to accept like results while we praise ours for their success. As Martin Luther Rex once noted, "it is cruel jest to say to a bootless man that he ought to lift himself by his own bootstraps."

Peradventure information technology is also overwhelming to deal with poverty, so we don't. We just take information technology as a abiding variable in our equation. Fifty-fifty though nosotros may never "solve" the larger social effect, there are smart policies that at least tin simulate for lower-income families some of the benefits that higher-income ones enjoy and/or mitigate some of the inherent disadvantages. Recognizing that we exercise some of that already (costless-reduced lunch programs, Title I, Head Start, etc.), one can argue that we hardly scratch the surface in mitigating the effects of poverty. Leaving out larger national issues regarding taxation policy and social programs, in that location are more than straight solutions we can examine on a state or local level:

  • We demand comprehensive educational activity funding reform that includes a real weighted formula. I would argue that the formula Gov. Brown proposed before this year doesn't provide plenty actress money to low-income school districts. Let'south be honest: We need to pay teachers in difficult-to-staff districts a lot more than they become paid in wealthy districts, while recognizing we can't cutting revenue further for whatever school commune.
  • Despite virtually universal recognition that early childhood education is critical for students' future learning, the U.Due south. ranks 28th among countries in the per centum of 4-year-olds in early childhood educational activity. Wasn't kindergarten only a gauge made many years ago as the appropriate first for public schooling? Now we accept scientific evidence that it's actually likewise late. So, instead of "transitional kindergarten," let's add a year or ii of preschool equally function of the normal public schoolhouse system.
  • Nosotros need to invest more in teacher training to provide high-quality individualized instruction, appraise students, collaborate, and (to paraphrase Luis Moll'southward research into "funds of knowledge") tap into the subconscious home and community resources of their lower-income students.
  • We should encourage courageous conversations about poverty in each school district, recognizing that what may have been considered "outside the scope" of public education is really a crucial element in helping children succeed in schoolhouse. What can each schoolhouse district practise beyond its traditional role to provide this kind of support?
  • Can nosotros expand the partnerships betwixt the schoolhouse system and the broader community, whether they be city and county governments, local businesses, and nonprofits? Can we appoint more members of the customs to expand the "village" that is raising our children?
  • It'due south time to expand the role and scope of our schools. Why shouldn't our schools e'er be open up every bit a resources centre for our children? Jamie Vollmer famously documented the ever increasing social and societal burden on our public schools while not, in half-dozen decades, adding any fourth dimension to the calendar. Permit's take that role seriously and design schools to be that place –  and have the resources – to provide children with the support they need from at to the lowest degree dawn to dusk.

Of course all of this is not possible without real funding for schools. With California ranking virtually the bottom of all states in about all measures of public schoolhouse investment, we need to face the reality that, yes, information technology is indeed nearly money and our willingness to invest in public schools. Sure, permit's talk nigh better ways to manage and evaluate teachers; let's talk about accountability; but unless nosotros confront the big trouble, then we'll simply continue to be on our hands and knees looking for those proverbial keys we lost somewhere else.

Seth Rosenblatt is the president of the Governing Board of the San Carlos School Commune, currently in his second term. He besides serves as the president of the San Mateo Canton School Boards Association and sits on the Executive Commission of the Articulation Venture Silicon Valley Sustainable Schools Job Forcefulness. He has ii children in San Carlos public schools. He writes ofttimes on issues in public education, in regional and national publications besides every bit on his own blog. Seth has more than 20 years of experience in media and applied science, including executive positions in both start-upwards companies and large enterprises. Seth currently operates his ain consulting house for technology companies focused on strategy, marketing, and business development. He holds a B.A. in Economic science from Dartmouth College and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business concern School.

To get more reports like this one, click here to sign up for EdSource's no-price daily electronic mail on latest developments in education.